FUNCTIONS OF MANAGEMENT – ORGANIZING

 

 

Organizing is the process of identification and grouping of activities, assigning duties and delegating authority to the managers, allocating necessary resources and establishing coordination among individuals and department of an organization with a view to attain its objectives.

 

PROCESS OF ORGANIZING :

 

The process of organising consists of the following steps –

 

  1. Identification of activities: Every enterprise is created with a specific purpose. Based on this, the activities involved can be identified. For example, in a manufacturing firm, producing goods and selling them are the major activities in addition to routine activities like, paying salary to employees; raising loans from outside, paying taxes to the government etc. and these activities vary when the organisation is a service concern or a trading firm.

 

  1. Grouping of activities: Once activities are identified, then they need to be grouped. They are grouped in different ways. The activities which are similar in nature can be grouped as one and a separate department can be created. For example – activities undertaken before sale of a product, during the sale of the product and after the sale of the product can be grouped under the functions of a marketing department. Normally, all activities of a manufacturing unit can be grouped into major functions like purchasing, production, marketing, accounting and finance, etc. and each function can be subdivided into various specific jobs.

 

 

  1. Assignment of Responsibilities: Having completed the exercise of identifying, grouping and classifying all activities into specific jobs, they can be assigned to individuals to take care of.

 

  1. Granting authority: On the basis of responsibilities given to specific individuals, they are also to be given the necessary authority to ensure effective performance.

 

  1. Establishing relationship: This is a very important job of management as everybody in the organisation should know as to who he/she is to report, thereby establishing a structure of relationships. By doing so, relationships become clear and delegation is facilitated.

 

ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE

 

Organization structure is a network of formal authority relationships among people within which behaviour and activities of people are regulated for the accomplishment of organizational objectives.

 

Forms of Organizational Structure

 

  • Line Organization

 

  • Pure Line: – Activities at a particular level are same, every employee performs by & large the same type of work.

 

  • Departmental Line: – Whole work divided into functional Departments. Each Department works as a self-sufficient unit under the supervision & direction of a department manager who himself work under the immediate boss.

 

  • Line and Staff Organization

 

It is one that has line managers with direct vertical relationships between different levels in the organization in addition to the specialist responsible for advising and assisting the line managers.

 

  • Functional Organization

 

According to this, Line authority is channelized through the staff specialists. In such an organizational structure, Line authority runs through many functional experts who have authority to issue orders in their respective areas of specialisation.

 

  • Project Organization

 

It is a temporary structure designed to accomplish a specific task or project with the help of specialists drawn from different functional departments within the organization.

 

 

  • Matrix OR Grid Organization

 

It is permanent Organizational Structure designed to accomplish specific project or result by using using teams of specialists drawn from different functional departments within the organization.It is a combination of project organization and functional organization.

 

  • Committee Organization

 

It is a group of 2 or more appointed, nominated or elected persons to consider, discuss decide, recommend or report on some issue or matter assigned to it.

 

 

Informal & Formal Organization

 

Formal organisation refers to the officially established pattern of relationships among departments, divisions and individuals to achieve well-defined goals and is a consciously designed structure of roles.

 

Informal organisations on the other hand, refers to relationship between individuals in the organisation based on personal attitudes, likes and dislikes and originates to meet their social and emotional needs and develops spontaneously.

 

Delegation

 

The active process of entrustment of a part of work or responsibility and authority to another and the creation of accountability for performance is known as delegation. Thus, there are three elements of delegation as follows-

 

  • Assignment of Responsibility: This is also known as entrustment of duties. Duties can be divided into two parts: one part, that the individual can perform himself and the other part, that he can assign to his subordinates to perform.

 

  • Granting Authority: Authority refers to the official powers and position required to carry on any task. When duties are assigned to subordinates then the required authority must also be conferred to him

 

  • Creating Accountability: The delegatee is fully answerable to his superior for performance of the task assigned to him. Thus, the superior ensures performance through accountability by his subordinate.

 

 

Decentralization

 

Decentralisation refers to a systematic effort to delegate authority at all levels of management and in all departments. This shifts the power of decision making to lower level under a well considered plan.

Decentralisation has number of benefits. Firstly, it reduces the workload of the top level management. Secondly, it motivates the employees and gives them more autonomy. It promotes initiative and creativity. It also helps employees to take quick and appropriate decisions. In this process, the top management is freed from the routine jobs and it enables them to concentrate on crucial areas and plan for growth.

 

Distinction between Delegations and Decentralisation

 

Decentralisation is not same as delegation. The points of differences are –

  • While delegation is the process of assigning responsibility and authority and thereby creating accountability; decentralisation is the ultimate outcome of planned delegation.
  • Delegation of authority takes place between the manager and his subordinates while decentralisation involves the entire organisation, and is between top management and divisions/departments.
  • Delegation is done to speed up the work and is essential in trace; while decentralisation is optional and is usually done in large scale organisations.
  • In case of delegation the responsibility and authority delegated may be withdrawn by the delegator; which is not so easy in case of decentralisation.

 

Meghalaya Public Finance And Fiscal Policy

 

Meghalaya Public Finance And Fiscal Policy

The state of Meghalaya, along with all the other states in the NER, has been given special category status by the central government. Special category status is accorded to a state with certain characteristics that necessitate stronger than normal hand-holding by the central government. The predominant characteristics relate to geographic terrain, specifically hilly or mountainous tracts.

GSDP OF MEGHALAYA:

The Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) is likely to underestimate income in Meghalaya, which is characterised by subsistence agriculture and a significant dependence of people on community forests for meeting various needs.The real GSDP of Meghalaya grew at a trend rate of 5.93 per cent per annum between 1999–2000 and 2007–08 (at 1999–2000 prices). The population of Meghalaya during the same period grew at a trend rate of 1.39 per cent per annum. Real per capita GSDP of Meghalaya thus grew at 4.48 per cent per annum during that period.Meghalaya Public Finance And Fiscal Policy

Low population density accords certain natural advantages from (potentially) larger availability of terrestrial resources, but several disadvantages from the point of view of ensuring reach of public services to a sparse population. For example, Meghalaya reports a lower literacy rate and a higher poverty ratio than that of the NER as a whole. Trend growth rate of aggregate GSDP for Meghalaya and NEREAM(the north-east region excluding Assam and Meghalaya)  stood, respectively, at 5.99 and 7.35 per cent per annumbetween the years 1999– 2000 and 2005–06.Meghalaya thus has a significant head start (as compared to NEREAM) in its effort to catch up with the average all India per capita GDP.

Growth component over period 2000- 2006:-

  • There has been some decline in the share of agriculture and allied sectors, as also in the service sectors.
  • In 1999–2000, the mining and quarrying sector contributed almost two-fifths of industry GSDP in Meghalaya, but the share has gradually declined to about onethird in 2005–06.

 

INVESTMENT FOR ACCELERATING GROWTH:-

Improving the standard of living of the people would require sustained increases in per capita income levels. Given the current levels of income, this will require a significant acceleration in growth rate. If by 2030 the people of Meghalaya are to achieve living standards comparable to the rest of India, their per capita GSDP would need to grow at an average rate of 11.5 per cent.

The North Eastern Region: Vision 2020, an illustrative scheme for accelerating the growth process of Meghalaya shows:-

Average Annual Growth Rate (%) till 2029-30:

Required GSDP CAGR (%)–9.92

Projected Population CAGR (%)–1.04

Implied Per Capita GSDP Growth (%)–8.88

Projection of Investment Requirements to Achieve Economic Target by 2030:-

Required CAGR (%) of GSDP:-

2012-13 to 2016-17 = 9.45

2017-18 to 2021-22  =10.25

2022-23 to 2026-27 = 10.25

2026-27 to 2029-30  =10.25

Required Investment to Achieve Growth Target In Crores, 2009-10 Prices:-

2012-13 to 2016-17  =28937

2017-18 to 2021-22  =50097

2022-23 to 2026-27  =81603

2026-27 to 2029-30  =71882

Required Investment as Percentage of GSDP:-

2012-13 to 2016-17  = 34.8

2017-18 to 2021-22  =37.2

2022-23 to 2026-27  = 37.2

2026-27 to 2029-30  =37.2

Meghalaya requires a massive investment as well as significant increase in productivity if it desires to achieve a standard of living somewhere near that of the rest of India by 2030. Investment requirements may be met from savings and borrowings, both government and private.

In the case of the government, capital expenditure is of the nature of investments and may be financed from current revenues (tax and non-tax), but only if there is revenue surplus (zero revenue deficits). In the eight year period, from 2000–01 to 2007–08, Meghalaya was revenue surplus in six years (all but 2001–02 and 2004–05). However, the revenue surplus is barely 2 per cent of GSDP and can at best cover only a small fraction of the additional investment requirements. Even with optimistic assumptions on the ICOR(increment capital output ratio), the (desirable) investment rate averages about 37 per cent of GSDP. Thus other feasible avenues of resources have to be rigorously explored.

A possible source of investment lies in additional government borrowing, which adds to government public debt either through public accounts or other internal and external borrowings. This in turn results in an increase in the fiscal deficit in government accounts. Between 2000–01 and 2007–08, the fiscal deficit for Meghalaya has varied between 1.1 per cent and 6.3 per cent of GSDP (with an average of 3.8 per cent) In years of revenue surplus, the full measure of fiscal deficits may, arguably, be assumed to finance capital expenditures or new investments. Thus, revenue surplus and budgetary borrowing together allow for (on an average) about 5 per cent of GSDP as new investment or capital expenditure. In fact, capital expenditure as derived from budgets averaged less than 4.5 per cent of GSDP between 2000–01 and 2007–08.

It appears that less than 15 per cent of investment needs are being met from public sources. The remainder of investment has to come from the private sector. In many cases, this can be facilitated through public-private partnerships.

GROWTH OF REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE:-

Between 2000–01 and 2007–08, total revenues for Meghalaya show the lowest rate of 12.13% growth as compared to15.71%  the NER or NEREAM . Growth rates of total revenues reflect a similar picture even for a longer period between 1987–88 and 2007–08(11.47% for Meghalaya and 12.24% for NER) . Further, for the period between 2000–01 and 2007–08, the rate of growth of each category of revenue (tax, non-tax, grants-in-aid, and contributions) in Meghalaya trails the rate of growth of the respective components for NEREAM.

The tax-GSDP ratio of Meghalaya increased from 7.14 per cent in 2000–01 to 11.61 per cent in 2007–08. Similarly, the tax-GSDP ratio for NEREAM has also increased from 6.54 per cent in 2000–01 to 11.24 per cent in 2007–08. Thus, despite the higher growth rate of GSDP and buoyancy in taxes, the tax-GSDP ratio for NEREAM is lower than for Meghalaya. But it is also apparent that in the last decade or so, NEREAM has been gradually catching up with Meghalaya, which is possibly losing its pre-eminent position in the NER. Alternatively, one may interpret this as an improvement in balanced development of the NER.Thus, capital expenditure in Meghalaya is critically straining existing infrastructure, with consequent social and economic costs in terms of growth and employment. This feeds back into revenue mobilisation performance as observed with a deceleration in tax revenues for Meghalaya. An urgent redressal of this situation appears to be desirable.

STRUCTURE OF REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE:-

  • The differences in growth rates of the components of revenue and expenditure have resulted in significantly altering their structure in the last decade. Thus, the share of grantsin-aid and contributions, which constituted more than two-thirds of revenues for Meghalaya in 2000–01, has declined to about 56 per cent in 2007–08.
  • For Meghalaya the share of tax revenues (in total revenues) increased from about one-quarter in 2000–01 to more than one-third in 2007–08. The share of non-tax revenues has shown some increase over the period, but remains less than 10 per cent.
  • In Meghalaya, the share of revenue expenditure in total expenditure increased by about 3 percentage points, with an equivalent reduction in the share of capital expenditure.
  • Segregating tax revenues into own-tax revenues and share in central taxes shows that between 2000–01 and 2007– 08, for Meghalaya, there is some decline in the proportion of own-taxes.
  • In contrast to the revenue expenditure scenario, non-developmental capital expenditure entails only a small proportion that was less than 5 per cent of total capital expenditure in 2000–01. This proportion appears to be rising but remained less than 10 per cent in 2007–08. The remainder (above 90 per cent) is being incurred as developmental capital expenditure.
  • Almost 60 per cent of developmental revenue expenditure in Meghalaya was incurred on social services in 2000–01. But this proportion has been declining and is close to one-half in 2007–08.
  • Developmental revenue expenditure on economic services has increased in Meghalaya.

Differences in the growth rates of components of revenue and expenditure have affected their structures. In turn, this has affected the structure of deficits. From the beginning of the last decade, revenue deficits showed a decline, and for the NER states as a whole, revenue deficits were quickly transformed into surplus that has been rising. This reversal of deficits to surplus also has to do with the promulgation of fiscal responsibility and budget management (FRBM) acts, duly incentivised by the recommendations of the Twelfth Finance Commission. Unfortunately, the effort appears more to satisfy accounting prudence than to influence expenditure efficiency and effectiveness that improves outcomes. Among several causes impacting GSDP of a state and its consequent resource mobilisation capacity, issues in extant governance in the state play a critical role. The present polity of the state of Meghalaya does not present itself as a coherent, synchronised, and harmonious institution. In particular, this impacts not only the direction of public expenditure, but more so its effectiveness. Analogously, it presents difficulties in exercising tax or revenue efforts, with consequent influence on scope, level, and coverage of public services.

OUTLOOK OF MEGHALAYA ECONOMY IN RECENT PAST AND FUTURTE ASPECT OF GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT:-

The GSDP at current market prices for the year 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17 was estimated at  22,938.24 crore, 24,408.07 crore,  26,745.23 crore and  29,566.90 crore respectively, registering an annual percentage growth of 6.41 percent, 9.58 percent and 10.55 percent respectively. At constant (2011-12) prices, the GSDP of the state during the same period was estimated at 20,725.71 crore, 21,151.83 crore,  22,507.01crore and ` 24,004.75 crore with corresponding annual growth of 2.06 percent, 6.41 percent and 6.65 percent.

The share of Primary Sector (Agriculture, Livestock, Forestry, Fishery and Mining & Quarrying) at current market prices accounted for 23.25 percent, 18.48 percent, 18.24 percent and 17.74 percent during the year 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17. During the same period, its share of GSDP at constant (2011-12) prices were 23.77 percent, 19.28 percent, 19.02 percent, 18.61 percent.

The Secondary Sector contributed 24.38 percent in 2013-14, 26.14 percent in 2014-15, 26.36 percent in 2015-16 and 26.08 percent in 2016-17 to the GSDP at current market prices. At constant (2011-12) prices, its contribution were 25.79 percent, 26.99 percent, 26.74 percent and 26.31 percent during the same period.

The Service/Tertiary Sector being the major contributor towards the economy of the state contributed 47.60 percent in 2013-14, 49.19 percent in 2014-15, 48.93 percent in 2015-16 and 49.54 percent in 2016-17 to the GSDP at current market prices. At constant (2011-12) market prices, its contribution during the same period were 45.91 percent, 47.83 percent, 48.29 percent and 49.11 percent respectively.

The Per Capita GSDP at current market prices stood at  73,168/-,  75,228/-,  81,765/- and  88,497/- during 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015- 16 and 2016-17 showing an annual increase of 4.18 percent, 7.26 percent and 8.23 percent. The estimates of per capita GSDP at constant (2011-12) prices were  66,111/-,  66,058/-,  68,808/- and  71,849/- with the corresponding annual growth of -0.08 percent, 4.16 percent and 4.42 percent.

Overview of the State Government Finances:

During 2015-16, the Revenue Surplus increased to  695.40 crore as compared to  176.42 crore during 2014-15 on account of increase in Revenue Receipts brought about mainly by higher revenue realization from the State’s Own Tax Revenue and increase in the State’s Share of Central Taxes against a marginal increase of 1.53 percent in Revenue Expenditure.

The Revenue Surplus is estimated to reduce to  386.90crore during 2016-17 (RE) on account of higher estimated revenue expenditure. The lower Revenue Surplus during 2014-15 has also affected the Fiscal Deficit during the year, increasing the fiscal deficit to  978.44crore as compared to  382.18 crore during 2013-14. The Fiscal Deficit reduce to  554.76crore during 2015-16 (Actual) due to estimated higher devolution of Central Taxes. The Fiscal Deficit during 2016-17 is estimated to increase to  1089.75crore on account of higher revenue expenditure.

The Primary Deficit of  572.84crore during 2014-15 reduced to  88.88 crore during 2015-16 (Actual). The same is, however, estimated to increase to  538.46crore during 2016-17.

  • The Revenue Surplus during 2015-16 is higher than that of 2014-15 on account of higher than proportionate increase in revenue receipt as compared to expenditure. The revenue surplus is estimated to reduce during 2016-17 as the revenue receipts is estimated to increase by 28 percent over 2015-16, whereas the revenue expenditure is estimated to increase by 35 percent.
  • With regard to deficit indicators, the fiscal policy of Government continues to be guided by the principle of gradual adjustment. The performance in respect of revenue surplus during the ensuing year and the rolling targets are in line with the revised roadmap of fiscal consolidation, as amended in 2015 and significant improvement is expected over the medium-term. The fiscal deficit will breach the statutory limit of 3 per cent of GSDP during the ensuing fiscal 2017-18 and rolling targets for the next two years. However, efforts to contain the fiscal deficit to within feasible limits will be initiated through revenue and expenditure management measures.
  • As per the Statement, the fiscal deficit of the State during 2014-15 was 4.01 percent of GSDP due to the fall in the State’s Own Revenue. However, the fiscal deficit greatly improved during 2015-16 to 2.07 percent of GSDP with the increase in State’s Share of Central Taxes in view of the recommendation of the Fourteenth Finance Commission. However, the Fiscal Deficit is estimated at 3.69 percent during 2016-17 as a result of lower estimated receipt from Share of Central Taxes and Grants as well as State’s Own Tax Revenue. The fiscal deficit is estimated at 3.80 percent of GSDP during 2017-18 on account of anticipated higher revenue expenditure.
  • The total liabilities as a percentage of GSDP from 2014-15 to 2017-18 (BE) are above the limit of 25 percent recommended by the Fourteenth Finance Commission. However, the ratio is sought to be reduced during the two year projections.

Fiscal Outlook for 2018-19 and 2019-20:-

The parameters of the Government’s medium term fiscal projections are the FRBM limits and the budget estimates. These are, however, subject to fluctuations depending on the state of the economy and central transfers, which directly affect the fiscal performance of the State. As explained earlier the fiscal deficit target of 3 per cent of GDP was mandated to be maintained throughout the award period of the Fourteenth Finance Commission (2015 – 2020), as per amended FRBM Act. The FD for 2018-19 and 2019-20 has therefore been assumed at 3.45 and 3.06 per cent of GSDP respectively.

  1. Receipts:

(a) Revenue Receipts:

The State’s Own Tax and Non Tax Revenue has increased from  1,282.51crore in 2014-15 to 1,285.41 crore in 2015-16 and is estimated to further increase to  1,734.71 crore in 2016-17 and  2,071.75 crore in BE 2017-18.

The State’s Share of Central Taxes has increased from  1,381.69crore in 2014-15 to  3,276.46 crore in 2015-16. The same is estimated to increase further to  3,668.82 crore during 2016-17 and  4,339.22 crore during 2017-18 as the Fourteenth Finance Commission has recommended an increased share of tax devolution to from 32 per cent to 42 per cent of the divisible pool, and a higher ratio recommended for the State out of the sharable taxes.

Other Central transfers such as grants for Central Sector and Centrally Sponsored Schemes, NEC, NLCPR and EAPs, etc. reduced from  3,764.08 crore in 2014-15 to  2,481.25 crore in 2015-16. This is, however, estimated to increase to  3,577.32crore in 2016-17 and  4,868.83 crore BE 2017-18. Consequent to the recommendations of the Fourteenth Finance Commission, the Centre has stop releasing grants to the State for financing its plan schemes and the State is required to meet such requirements out of the fiscal space provided by the higher tax devolution from the fiscal 2015-16.

  1. 2. Expenditure:

The total expenditure of  7,426.46crore in 2014-15 increased to  7,616.96 crore in 2015-16. The estimated expenditure of  10,103.19 crore in 2016-17 has been increased during the course of the year through additional allocations made by way of supplementary demands for grants, thereby enhancing its expenditure allocations over the budget estimates. Efforts are being made to maintain the fiscal deficit targets for the year through continuation of the extant economy measures, budgetary cut and restrictions on Non Plan expenditure. The total expenditure for 2017-18 is estimated at  12,537.81crore.

(a). Revenue Expenditure: the expenditure has increased marginally by 1.53 percent from 6,251.86 crore in 2014-15 to 16,347.72 crore in 2015-16. The revenue expenditure is estimated to increase to  8,593.95crore in 2016-17 and further to 110,647.63 crore in BE 2017-18. The major components of the revenue expenditure of the Government include Interest Payments, Maintenance expenditure, Subsidies, Salaries and Pensions.

Consequent to the merger of Plan and Non-Plan classification of expenditure by the Government of India from the fiscal 2017- 18, the State Government has also made a similar shift from the Budget of 2017-18.

Fiscal Policy for the ensuing financial year:

The fiscal policy for 2017-18 will continue to be guided by the objectives of the FRBM Act, that is to generate revenue surplus and reduce fiscal deficit and build up adequate surplus for discharging the liabilities and for developmental expenditures; (b) pursue policies to raise non tax revenue with due emphasis on cost recovery and equity; (c) prioritize capital expenditure and to pursue an expenditure policy that would provide impetus for economic growth with social equity and improvement in poverty reduction and human welfare.

  • Tax Policy:The collection out of the State’s Own tax and Non Tax Revenue during the 3rd quarter of 2016-17 was about 93 percent of the Budget Estimates for the quarter. Continuing with its efforts of revenue augmentation, the State will endeavour to improve its revenue collection in 2017-18 through periodic review, identification and introduction of new revenue collection measures.
  • Expenditure Policy: Expenditure will be focused on economic growth with social equity and improvement in poverty reduction and human welfare, the Government will continue with its policy of providing adequate resources for sectors such as education, health & family welfare, agriculture & allied activities, rural development and transport infrastructure apart from making adequate provision for meeting committed liabilities such as salaries, pension, interest payment and repayment of loans and advances.

The Fifth Meghalaya Pay Commission constituted by the Government to examine the existing structure of emoluments, etc is expected to submit its report by mid-term 2017-18, it is anticipated that the recommendation of the Pay Commission will cause additional financial implication for the State Government.

  • Borrowings:In 2015-16 the market borrowings of the State was This is estimated to increase to 948.30crore in 2016-17 and  1,025.00 crore during 2017-18. Other sources of borrowings constitute loans from financial institutions, Central Government loans for EAPs and Public Account.
  • Consolidated Sinking Fund: During 1999-2000 the Government constituted a “Consolidated Sinking Fund” for redemption and amortization of open market loan. In 2015-16 the Government has appropriated an amount of 38crore from revenue and credited to the Fund for investment in the Government of India Securities. The outstanding as at the end of 2016-17 is estimated at about 383.56crore.
  • Contingent and other Liabilities: Though at present there is no statutory limit as to the outstanding amount of contingent liabilities, the State is committed to restricting the issue of guarantees, except on selective basis where the viability of the scheme to be guaranteed is assured and the scheme is beneficial to the State. To service contingent liabilities arising out of the invocation of State Government Guarantees, the Government has constituted the Meghalaya Guarantee Redemption Fund managed by the Reserve Bank of India. During 2015-16 an amount of 74crore was transferred to the fund account.

The State has, amongst other things, great economic prospect in tourism and agriculture and allied sectors. However, the comparative advantage in these sectors can be leveraged, provided necessary logistics in terms of economic infrastructure like road connectivity, scheme-convergence, capacity building, financial assistance to prospective entrepreneurs etc,  which require substantial investment, both for creating assets and maintenance of existing ones, are in place. This requires the State Government to earmark adequate financial resources over and above normal government expenditures for State intervention in these crucial sectors through State development schemes.

Thus state of Meghalaya is on its right path to fiscal prudence and FRBM limit without compromising growth potential and business environment. State is also a role model for other states in terms of environment protection.

FUNCTIONS OF MANAGEMENT

 

Functions of Management:-

Planning

Organizing

Staffing

Direction

Coordination and control

Decision making

OUTPUT

Attainment goals effectively & efficiently

 

 

 

INPUTS/RESOURCES

Human

Finance

 

CONTROLLING

Measuring performance with standards & taking corrective actions

PLANNING

Setting of objects & selecting ways

ORGANIZING

Establishing relationships,

Delagting authority & assign tasks

DIRECTING

Leading & motivating employees to attain objectives

 

FUNCTIONS OF MANAGEMENT

 

PLANNING

Planning is a process of determination of organization’s objectives and selecting the courses of actions. i.e. Plans for attaining them.

Planning is the primary or basic management function.

 

Planning Process

Environmental scanning
Setting Objectives
Establishing Planning Premises
Searching alternatives
Evaluating alternatives
Selecting the most appropriate alternative
Formulating derivative plans
Budgeting i.e. Committing Resources
Implementing Plans
Follow – up actions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Types/Dimensions of Planning

 

  • Corporate Planning : Business product line

 

  • Long term Planning : > 5years

 

  • Short term Planning : 1 year

 

  • Medium term Planning : 2-5 years

 

  • Strategic planning : Long term, corporate planning for dealing with the organization Competitive environment.

 

  • Operational or Tactical Planning : Plans that specified detail operations needed to achieve The overall organizational goals. (Short range planning)

(Administrative Plans)

 

  • Functional Planning : Production, Marketing, Personnel, Finance.

 

 

Components/Elements of Planning

 

Objectives :    The basic tools that underline all planning and strategic activities.

 

Strategy:         The Long term action plan to attain objectives.

 

Policies:           These are general statements or understanding that guide or channel thinking in decision making.

 

Procedure:      A Chronological Sequence of steps or actions to be taken to accomplish a  Specific task or job.

 

Method:          It is a prescribed way of completing a step in a procedure.

 

Rules:            Specific recored statements that direct what must or must not be done in a Given situation.

 

Standards:      It is a measure against whuch the level of performance is measured or  Evaluated.

 

Programmes: An action plan consisting sequence and timing of steps necessary to achieve Objectives.

 

Schedules:        A plan which indicates the time of commencement of task, passing through Different stages or process and finalising the task.

 

Budgets:        Numerical Plan containing expected result in quantative way.

 

Project:          It is smaller action plan and a distinct part of a programme.

Tactics:          Short term action plan for implementing strategy.

WEALTH MAXIMIZATION

 

 

 

Concept:

 

 

Wealth maximization is the concept of increasing the value of a business in order to increase the value of the shares held by stockholders. The concept requires a company’s management team to continually search for the highest possible returns on funds invested in the business, while mitigating any associated risk of loss.

 

Wealth maximization simply means maximization of shareholder’s wealth. It is a combination of two words viz. wealth and maximization. A wealth of a shareholder maximizes when the net worth of a company maximizes.

 

Objectives:

 

 

  1. Measurement of Wealth
  2. Market Value of Shares
  3. Common Goal
  4.  D’s Of Financial Decisions
  5. Shareholder’s Expectations

 

 

  1. Measurement of Wealth

 

The main Principle of financial management is the Maximization of Shareholders Wealth. Shareholder’s Wealth is measured on the basis of economic value. Economic value is based on cash flows and not profit. Economic Value is defined as: “The present value of future cash flows generated by a decision, discounted at appropriate rate of discount which reflects the degree of associated risk“.

 

  1. Market Value of Shares

 

The future cash flow is estimated for the present value. The present value is the Market price of share. As Shareholder’s wealth is equal to the market price of shares held by him, any increase in Market price of shares would result in an increase in Shareholder’s Wealth.

 

  1. Common Goal

The Maximization of Shareholder’s Wealth is the common goal between the Shareholders and the Management. The recognition of this goal motivates the Management to allocate the available resources in an optimum way.

 

 

 

 

 

  1. 3 D’s Of Financial Decisions

The Maximization of Shareholder’s wealth indicates that the Market price of share is related to three basic financial decisions:

The investment decisions,

The financing decision,

The dividend decision.

 

  1. Shareholder’s Expectations

 

Shareholder’s expectations are about future cash flows based on current cash flows and projected future growth. The market price of share shows these expectations.

MARKETING MIX  

 

Marketing involves a number of activities. To begin with, an organisation may decide on its target group of customers to be served. Once the target group is decided, the product is to be placed in the market by providing the appropriate product, price, distribution and promotional efforts. These are to be combined or mixed in an appropriate proportion so as to achieve the marketing goal. Such mix of product, price, distribution and promotional efforts is known as ‘Marketing Mix’.

 

 

 

So, Marketing Mix consists of 4Ps They are :-

 

  • Products,
  • Price,
  • Place (distribution) and

 

These 4 ‘P’s are called as elements of marketing and together they constitute the marketing mix. All these are inter-related because a decision in one area affects decisions in other areas.

 

PRODUCT:

 

Product refers to the goods and services offered by the organisation. A pair of shoes, a plate of dahi-vada, a lipstick, all are products. All these are purchased because they satisfy one or more of our needs.  The term product is defined as “anything that can be offered to a market to satisfy a want”. It normally includes physical objects and services. So, in simple words, product can be described as a bundle of benefits which a marketer offers to the consumer for a price.

 

Product can be broadly classified on the basis of

 

 (1) USE,    (2) DURABILITY,   and    (3)TANGIBLITY

 

  • Based onUSE, the product can be classified as:

 

   (a) Consumer Goods and

(b) Industrial Goods.

 

  • Consumer goods: Goods meant for personal consumption by the households or ultimate consumers are called consumer goods. This includes items like toiletries, groceries, clothes etc. Based on consumers’ buying behaviour the consumer goods can be further classified as :

 

(i) Convenience Goods;   (ii) Shopping Goods; and  (iii) Speciality Goods.

 

  • Convenience Goods :

 

The convenience goods are bought frequently without much planning or shopping effort and are also consumed quickly. Buying decision in case of these goods does not involve much pre-planning. Such goods are usually sold at convenient retail outlets.

 

  • Shopping Goods:

 

These are goods which are purchased less frequently and are used very slowly like clothes, shoes, household appliances. In case of these goods, consumers make choice of a product considering its suitability, price, style, quality and products of competitors and substitutes, if any. In other words, the consumers usually spend a considerable amount of time and effort to finalise their purchase decision as they lack complete information prior to their shopping trip. shopping goods involve much more expenses than convenience goods.

 

  • Speciality Goods :

 

As  some special characteristics of certain categories of goods, people generally put special efforts to buy them. They are ready to buy these goods at prices at which they are offered and also put in extra time to locate the seller to make the purchase. Examples of speciality goods are cameras, TV sets, new automobiles etc.

 

(b) Industrial Goods:  Goods meant for consumption or use as inputs in production    of other products or provision of some service is termed as ‘industrial goods’. These are meant for non-personal and commercial use and include (i) raw materials, (ii) machinery, (iii) components, and (iv) operating supplies (such as lubricants, stationery etc). The buyers of industrial goods are supposed to be knowledgeable, cost conscious and rational in their purchase and therefore, the marketers follow different pricing, distribution and promotional strategies for their sale.

 

  • Based on DURABILITY , the products can be classified as :

 

(a) Durable Goods and

 (b) Non-durable Goods

 

  • Durable Goods : Durable goods are products which are used for a long period i.e., for months or years together. Examples of such goods are refrigerator, car, washing machine etc. In case of these goods, seller’s reputation and presale and after-sale service are important determinants of purchase decision.

 

  • Non-durable Goods: Non-durable goods are products that are normally consumed in one go or last for a few uses. Examples of such products are soap, salt, pickles, sauce etc. These items are consumed quickly and we purchase these goods more often. Such items are generally made available by the producer through large number of convenient retail outlets. Profit margins on such items are usually kept low.

 

 

  • Based on TANGIBLITY , the products can be classified as:

 

(a) Tangible Goods and

(b) Intangible Goods.

 

  • Tangible Goods : Most goods, whether these are consumer goods or industrial goods and whether these are durable or non-durable, fall in this category as they have a physical form, that can be touched and seen. Thus, all items like groceries, cars, raw-materials, machinery etc. fall in the category of tangible goods.

 

  • Intangible Goods : Intangible goods refer to services provided to the individual consumers or to the organisational buyers (industrial, commercial, institutional, government etc.). Services are essentially intangible activities which provide want or need satisfaction. Medical treatment, postal, banking and insurance services etc., all fall in this category.

 

PRICING

 

 

It is the exchange value of goods and services in terms of money. Pricing (determination of price to be charged) is another important element of marketing mix and It plays a crucial role in the success of a product in the market.

 

It has to be fixed after taking various aspects into consideration. The factors usually taken into account while determining the price of a product can be broadly described as follows:

 

  • Cost: No business can survive unless it covers its cost of production and distribution. In large number of products, the retail prices are determined by adding a reasonable profit margin to the cost. Higher the cost, higher is likely to be the price, lower the cost lower the price.

 

  • Demand: Demand also affects the price in a big way. When there is limited supply of a product and the demand is high, people buy even if high prices are charged by the producer. The price is dependent upon prospective buyers’ capacity and willingness to pay and their preference for the product. In this context, price elasticity, i.e. responsiveness of demand to changes in price should also be kept in view.

 

 

  • Competition: The price charged by the competitor for similar product is an important determinant of price. A marketer would not like to charge a price higher than the competitor for fear of losing customers.

 

  • Marketing Objectives: A firm may have different marketing objectives such as maximisation of profit, maximisation of sales, bigger market share, survival in the market and so on. The prices have to be determined accordingly.

 

  • Government Regulation: Prices of some essential products are regulated by the government under the Essential Commodities Act. For example, prior to liberalisation of the economy, cement and steel prices were decided by the government. Hence, it is essential that the existing statutory limits, if any, are also kept in view while determining the prices of products by the producers.

 

METHODS OF PRICE FIXATION

Methods of fixing the price can be broadly divided into the following categories-

 

  1. Cost based pricing
  2. Competition based pricing
  3. Demand based pricing
  4. Objective based pricing

 

  1. Cost Based Pricing: Under this method, price of the product is fixed by adding the amount of desired profit margin to the cost of the product. While calculating the price in this way, all costs (variable as well as fixed) incurred in manufacturing the product are taken into consideration.

 

  1. Competition Based Pricing: In case of products where market is highly competitive and there is negligible difference in quality of competing brands, price is usually fixed closer to the price of the competing brands. It is called ‘young rate pricing’ and is a very convenient method because the marketers do not have to worry much about demand and cost and effect the change as per the changes by the industry leaders.

 

  1. Demand Based Pricing: At times, prices are determined by the demand for the product. Under this method, without paying much attention to cost and competitor’s prices, the marketers try to ascertain the demand for the product. If the demand is high they decide to take advantage and fix a high price. If the demand is low, they fix low prices for their product

 

  1. Objective Based Pricing: This method is applicable to introduction of new (innovative) products. If, at the introductory stage of the products, the organisation wishes to penetrate the market i.e., to capture large parts of the market and discourage the prospective competitors to enter into the fray, it fixes a low price. Alternatively, the organisation may decide to skim the market i.e., to earn high profit by taking advantage of a group of customers who give more importance to their status or distinction and are willing to pay even a higher price for it. In such a situation they fix quite high price at the introductory stage of their product and market it to only those customers who can afford it.

 

 

PLACE/DISTRIBUTION

 

A distribution channel consists of the set of people and firms involved in the transfer of title to a product as the product moves from producer to ultimate consumer or business user. Basically it refers to the vital links connecting the manufacturers and producers and the ultimate consumers/users. It includes both the producer and the end user and also the middlemen/agents engaged in the process of transfer of title of goods.

 

 

 

TYPES OF CHANNELS OF DISTRIBUTION

 

  • Zero stage channel of distribution

 

Manufacturer —-> Consumer

 

Zero stage distribution channel exists where there is direct sale of goods by the producer to the consumer. This direct contact with the consumer can be made through door-todoor salesmen, own retail outlets or even through direct mail.

 

  • One stage channel of distribution

 

Manufacturer—–>Retailer——–> Consumer

 

This type of distribution channel is preferred by manufacturers of consumer durables like refrigerator, air conditioner, washing machine, etc. where individual purchase involves large amount.

 

  • Two stage channel of distribution

 

Manufacturer—->Wholesaler—>Retailer—>Consumer

 

This is the most commonly used channel of distribution for the sale of consumer    goods. In this case, there are two middlemen used, namely, wholesaler and retailer. This is applicable to products where markets are spread over a large area, value of individual purchase is small and the frequency of purchase is high.

 

  • Three stage channel of distribution

 

Manufacturer—->Agents—-> Wholesaler—>Retailer—>Consumer

 

When the number of wholesalers used is large and they are scattered throughout the country, the manufacturers often use the services of mercantile agents who act as a link between the producer and the wholesaler. They are also known as distributor.

 

 

PROMOTION

 

Promotion refers to the process of informing and persuading the consumers to buy certain product. By using this process, the marketers convey persuasive message and information to its potential customers.

 

It is thus a persuasive communication and also serves as a reminder. A firm uses different tools for its promotional activities which are as follows:

 

– Advertising

– Publicity

– Personal selling

– Sales promotion

 

These are also termed as four elements of a promotion mix.

 

 

 

 

  • Advertising: Advertising is the most commonly used tool for informing the present and prospective consumers about the product, its quality, features, availability, etc. It is a paid form of non-personal communication through different media about a product, idea, a service or an organisation by an identified sponsor. It can be done through print media like newspaper, magazines, billboards, electronic media like radio, television etc. It is a very flexible and comparatively low cost tool of promotion.

 

  • Publicity: This is a non-paid process of generating wide range of communication to contribute a favourable attitude towards the product and the organisation. As the articles in newspapers about an organisation, its products and policies. The other tools of publicity are press conference, publication and news in the electronic media etc. It is published or broadcasted without charging any money from the firm. Marketers often spend a lot of time and effort in getting news items placed in the media for creation of a favourable image of the company and its products.

 

 

  • Personal selling: It is a direct presentation of the product to the consumers or prospective buyers. It refers to the use of salespersons to persuade the buyers to act favourably and buy the product. It is most effective promotional tool in case of industrial goods.

 

  • Sales promotion: This refers to short-term and temporary incentives to purchase or induce trials of new goods. The tool includes contests, games, gifts, trade shows, Discounts, etc. Sales promotional activities are often carried out at retail levels.

Horticulture in Meghalaya

Horticulture in Meghalaya

Meghalaya has three factors conducive for the development of horticulture – vast land suitable for horticulture development, diversity in agro-climatic factors making cultivation of an array of crops feasible and established tradition of horticulture activity making further expansion easy.

A large extent of land is available in the form of fallows, cultivable waste and miscellaneous tree crops. Most of this land is in hill slopes and is more suitable for plantation and fruit crops than traditional agricultural crops. With diversity in elevation, temperature, topography and rainfall a variety of horticultural crops can be grown.

Meghalaya has a long history of growing horticultural crops. Potato, Pineapple, orange, turmeric, ginger and areca nut are grown traditionally and besides these crops, a variety of new crops like tea, cashew and strawberry have been introduced. Most of the land used for these crops is not suitable for traditional agricultural crops like cereals, pulses, oil seeds and fibres. With the introduction of Horticulture in MeghalayaHorticulture Mission for North Eastern & Himalayan States, a lot of area expansion has taken place, but the programme has had little impact on marketing and processing. This can be taken as a potential for future development of the sector.

Strategy

  • Cluster approach to strengthen the existing concentration of crops. For each crop post harvest management and value chain management will be given emphasis so that additional income and employment will be generated in the State itself.
  • New technologies in Post-Harvest infrastructure like grading, packaging, ripening chambers will be introduced for the major crops in areas of their concentrations. As it is difficult to attract huge investment to start large scale processing units, small scale and cottage units will be encouraged and support will be provided for them.
  • Farmers associations (FPOs & FIGs, etc) will be promoted for development of horticulture as a holistic approach.
  • Convergence with other programmes will be established for optimising the resource use.
  • Demonstration of new technologies and crop management practices are being taken up with farmers and other stakeholders.

Quality planting material production

As good quality planting material is the backbone of any horticultural economy, this is one of the most important issues to be addressed, especially since there has been tremendous expansion of cultivation (under convergent schemes like the RKVY, BRGF, NREGS in addition to the normal schemes of the Department) and since around 60% of planting material is imported into the State either from nurseries in other States or from outside the country, resulting in increased production costs and draining of valuable foreign exchange. Moreover, the bulk of supply is from small, unregistered nurseries where quality is difficult to enforce.

The State will seek the involvement of the private sector through the establishment of nurseries, which could be registered and affiliated with the NHB and other recognised agencies, so that quality standards are adhered to and a system of surveillance and certification of the operating standards and planting material are put in place.

It is envisged that this will usher in income-earning opportunities for retired Departmental officers and entrepreneurial avenues for fresh unemployed graduates. The Planting Material Production Centres (PMPCs) set up with grants from the 13th Finance Commission, will produce quality planting material for new crops like strawberry, kiwi, raspberry and blackberry as well as for traditonal crops like potato, cashew, citrus (orange and sweet oranges), pineapple, spices (turmeric, ginger, black pepper) and temperate fruits. These PMPCs will be geared to cater not only to the planting material needs of their own clusters, but also to the needs of the other districts of the State as well as other States of the North East. The objective, in the long run, is to turn Meghalaya into a planting material destination for the entire North East.

 

Area expansion

Model orchards : There are a number of unique fruit crops which are indigenous to the State with tremendous commercial potential, but which have never been properly utilized due to the lack of organized cultivation. The area under many of these crops is declining and some are on the verge of extinction. Keeping in view the need to preserve the horticultural heritage of the State and to provide for the commercial cultivation and exploitation of these crops, there is an imperative need to demonstrate the economic viability of these crops through the establishment of model orchards. In order to make these model orchards successful, for emulation by the farming community, and to ensure their continuity, it is proposed that the orchards be set up within and in conjunction with the integrated farming proposed to be implemented in the micro-watersheds.

Theme villages : The remarkable success achieved in the ‘’Strawberry Village’’ of Sohliya in the Ri Bhoi district will be transferred to different crops and villages of the State. At least 1000 farmers in each such area will be motivated to take up cultivation of selected crops – Orchid Valley in Zikzak horti-hub area, Kiwi Village in the uplands in the vicinity of Shillong, Strawberry Villages in other districts, Citrus Hills in the Nokrek range, Pineapple Hills in the Chibinang area, etc.

Rejuvenation of citrus & cashew: The senile plantations of citrus and cashew will be brought under systematic and scientific rejuvenation to restore the profitability of these traditional crops for the benefit of this group of farmers, especially considering the potential for export of these crops to neighboring Bangladesh.

Post harvest management and processing

Meghalaya is predominantly a horticultural state where a wide range of fruit crops both indigenous and exotic are grown abundantly in different altitudes of the State. During the peak season of harvest the State experiences glut in the market and the farmers are not getting remunerative prices for their produces. To overcome the said problem the State had established two processing centres located in Shillong, East Khasi Hills district and Dainadubi in North Garo Hills district.

The objectives of these Centres were to demonstrate, develop value addition technology for the farmers and entrepreneurs of the State. These two Processing Centres are being upgraded and the products marketed as MEG brand. The Department had initiated programme on modernization of arecanut soakage tanks traditionally practiced by the farmers. These improved technologies have generated additional livelihood to the arecanut growers of the state. The Lakadong variety of Turmeric has high Curcumin content between 7 to 8 percent. Capitalizing on the potential of the turmeric grown in the State the Government had taken step to improve the processing technology adopted by the farmers. Effort is being made to attract private investment in the PHM sector by scaling up volume of production, especially targeting niche markets outside the country and setting up of scientific modern storage facilities across the state Traditional crops like ginger, turmeric, pineapple, citrus, potato and vegetables are the mainstay of a majority of the farmers of the State.

Marketing infrastructure

Farmers markets, implemented during the 11th Plan, will be expanded to cover more areas within the State during the 12th Plan, where farmers market will be tried on the hub and spoke model – large central markets and satellite markets in their hinterland. The effective functioning of farmers markets depends to a large extent on the flow and easy availability of market related information to enable farmers to take proper and profitable market decisions based on reliable real time data. Market information system is thus a crucial and urgent intervention that would be made in order to make Farmers Markets viable and vibrant entities leading to the evolution of a much more transparent marketing system.

 

[jetpack_subscription_form title=”Subscribe to MeghalayaPSC Notes” subscribe_text=”Never Miss any MeghalayaPSC important update!” subscribe_button=”Sign Me Up” show_subscribers_total=”1″]