Border Issues – Meghalaya PCS Free Notes

Meghalaya, nestled in the northeastern part of India, shares its boundaries with Assam, one of the region's larger states. Since its formation in 1972, Meghalaya has faced territorial disputes with Assam, which have occasionally led to tensions and conflicts. This article delves into the territorial disputes between Meghalaya and its neighbors, particularly Assam, and examines efforts to resolve these conflicts through diplomatic and legal channels.

Territorial Disputes with Neighboring States

1. Historical Background of Border Issues

Meghalaya was carved out of Assam in 1972 as a full-fledged state under the North-Eastern Areas (Reorganisation) Act of 1971.

The border between the two states was demarcated based on the 1876 notification by the British, which was perceived as unfavorable by Meghalaya.

Traditional boundaries followed by tribal communities were ignored in colonial-era boundary decisions, leading to disputes after independence.

2. Key Disputed Areas

Meghalaya and Assam have 12 disputed areas spanning around 884 square kilometers. The most prominent areas include:

Langpih (Kamrup District of Assam and West Khasi Hills of Meghalaya)

Langpih has been a hotspot for disputes, with both states claiming it. It holds significant historical and cultural value for the Khasi community.

Occasional skirmishes between locals and security forces have been reported.

Block I and Block II (Karbi Anglong of Assam and Jaintia Hills of Meghalaya)

These regions were transferred to Assam's jurisdiction during the colonial era, a move contested by Meghalaya.

The area is predominantly inhabited by the Jaintia tribe, who align culturally and ethnically with Meghalaya.

3. Factors Contributing to Disputes

Ethnic and Cultural Affiliations: Tribal populations in disputed areas often identify with Meghalaya due to shared cultural and linguistic heritage.

Resource Ownership: Forests, minerals, and agricultural land in disputed territories are sources of economic interest for both states.

Ambiguity in Agreements: Colonial-era notifications and post-independence agreements have left room for interpretation, adding to the complexity.

4. Impact of Border Disputes

Human Impact: Displacement of communities, loss of lives in skirmishes, and psychological stress for residents in disputed zones.

Economic Consequences: Stalled development projects and reduced economic activity in disputed areas due to uncertainty.

Governance Challenges: Strained relations between local administrations, affecting law and order.

Efforts to Resolve Conflicts Through Diplomacy

1. State-Level Dialogues

Both states have engaged in multiple rounds of talks since the 1970s to resolve disputes.

A Joint Boundary Commission was established to review claims and propose solutions.

In 2011, both states agreed to maintain the status quo in disputed areas to prevent violence.

2. Role of Central Government

The Ministry of Home Affairs has acted as a mediator in state-level negotiations.

In 2021, the central government encouraged states to form regional committees to address disputes.

3. Formation of Regional Committees

Meghalaya and Assam created regional committees in 2021 to focus on disputed areas.

Each committee included political leaders, bureaucrats, and local stakeholders.

Reports and ground surveys from these committees laid the foundation for further negotiations.

4. Partial Resolution of Disputes (2022)

In March 2022, Assam and Meghalaya signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to resolve disputes in six of the 12 identified areas.

The agreement emphasized shared governance, resource-sharing, and local engagement in decision-making.

5. Legal Approaches

Meghalaya has considered legal options, including seeking intervention from the Supreme Court, to address unresolved disputes.

6. Community-Led Initiatives

Tribal councils and civil society organizations have played a pivotal role in advocating peaceful resolutions.

Inter-community dialogues have been organized to reduce tensions and build trust.

7. Use of Technology in Dispute Resolution

Satellite mapping and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) have been employed to accurately demarcate boundaries.

Technology-aided surveys help create a shared understanding of the disputed territories.

Challenges in Resolving Border Issues

Historical Intransigence: Decades of mistrust between states have hindered progress.

Political Considerations: Border disputes often become political tools during elections, delaying resolutions.

Community Resistance: Fear of losing cultural identity and resources can lead to resistance against proposed solutions.

Ambiguity in Historical Documents: Colonial-era maps and agreements are often inconsistent, leading to differing interpretations.

The Way Forward

1. Strengthening Dialogue Mechanisms

Institutionalizing regular dialogue at both state and community levels.

Ensuring transparency in discussions to build public trust.

2. Involving Local Communities

Encouraging participation of tribal councils and local leaders in decision-making.

Conducting awareness campaigns to address misconceptions and build support for resolutions.

3. Developing Disputed Areas

Launching joint development projects in disputed regions to benefit residents.

Improving infrastructure, education, and healthcare to foster goodwill.

4. Leveraging Central Government Mediation

The central government can play a neutral role in mediating disputes and ensuring compliance with agreements.

Offering financial and technical assistance for boundary surveys and development projects.

5. Legal Framework

Establishing a permanent tribunal for inter-state boundary disputes.

Clarifying ambiguities in legal documents through expert panels.

Meghalaya PSC Notes brings Prelims and Mains programs for Meghalaya PSC Prelims and Meghalaya PSC Mains Exam preparation. Various Programs initiated by Meghalaya PSC Notes are as follows:-

For any doubt, Just leave us a Chat or Fill us a querry––